Friday, January 03, 2014
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
"Right now, it is raining methane on Titan. The planet Uranus, apparently trying to live up to its name, is orbiting the sun sideways, while Venus spins backwards. There are stars exploding, black holes gorging, galaxies colliding.
Here we sit, and some of us say, behold, look at the order of it all."
Sunday, June 03, 2012
What is wrong with holding moderate religious beliefs
"There's a fundamental battle between rationality and supernaturalism, between a worldview based around evidence and facts and one based around faith and superstition. That's the tension between theism and atheism, more so than any actual evil committed in the name of any god. Even if no atrocities or great social injustices have ever been committed in the name of your religion, if there's still zero evidence in favour of your claims, your religion isn't any more credible.
A strongly held belief in the Santa Claus is mostly harmless, and may well help you to be a more generous person, but it still requires you to ignore or rationalize away huge piles of evidence in order to maintain. This sort of Faith requires a suspension of the part of your brain responsible for telling sense from nonsense, and if you're willing to let something so huge as a God Claim through unchallenged, who knows what else might slip through the cracks? Once you admit that you believe in something "because of faith", you are essentially admitting that you don't care whether or not it is actually true. As soon as you stop caring about reality in one aspect of your life, it becomes that much easier to stop caring about reality in others.
The problem isn't specifically a hatred of gays/women/blacks/etc., or an opposition to Cosmology or Biology. The problem is delusion, dogma, and a willingness to ignore reality that one finds inconvenient. As far as most skeptics are concerned, people who believe uncritically in supernaturalist religion, who are willing to continue believing in extraordinary claims despite the complete lack of evidence, have a fundamentally dishonest worldview that can never fully coincide with evidence and rationality.
Furthermore, anyone who demands respect for uncritical acceptance of superstitious nonsense, even mostly harmless nonsense, is indirectly giving aid and comfort to the fundamentalists, because they're making it that much less acceptable to criticize those who hold similar beliefs which are obviously crazy or evil.
It's nice that some religious people share some political opinions with some atheists. It's nice that some religious people don't hate gay people, it's nice that some religious people accept evolution, it's nice that some religious people accept that the Big Bang happened. Heck, it's nice that most religious people are willing to accept that the Earth isn't flat. It's certainly better than the alternative.
But if you think those things are all that we take issue with, or that those are the only things wrong with theism or religion, then you're missing the point.
So, yes, we know you're not as bad as those crazies. But unless you're opposed to all of the things wrong with religion, don't be surprised if you're seen as part of the problem."
Sunday, April 01, 2012
The Big Lottery and rational thinking
Have people really stopped to think about what you are supporting by playing the lottery? People have gambling addictions and they will always be a certain percentage of the population that needs help. Those folks are buying lottery tickets every week as well as many other forms of gambling. I'm not discussing that group here. They need help.
The next group are the players who buys a ticket every week, but do not have a gambling/addiction problem. What is the demographic of this group? I bet it's not the same demographic as the folks who appear once or twice a year to buy a mega-millions ticket when it reaches over $250 million. This group is the same as my social circles that I converse with on a daily basis; my friends, family and co-workers.
I've reiterated my position with many in my social circle over the past week and get a very similar reactions. "Who is is it hurting?", "It gives people hope and that's a good thing" Really? I've heard the same argument to support theism. Not all beliefs are equally valid and many do not represent reality. An incorrect belief, here or there, may not be harmless, but it can also result in negative consequences. Pointing out fallacious reasoning behind these incorrect beliefs is important because beliefs inform your actions. If your beliefs are in error, your actions are most likely to be harmful in some way. It is far healthier for society as a whole if the beliefs of the majority are accurate.
If more people would take the time to think about the social and ethical effects of supporting base less hope, perhaps they would arrive at a conclusion that supporting the irrational does slow the moral zeitgeist of our world.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Friday, November 11, 2011
Google, complete my phrase please...
It's a blast.
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Does this mean Atheists can not serve on a Jury in MD according to the State Constitution
"Art. 36. That as it is the duty of every man to worship God in such manner as he thinks most acceptable to Him, all persons are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty; wherefore, no person ought by any law to be molested in his person or estate, on account of his religious persuasion, or profession, or for his religious practice, unless, under the color of religion, he shall disturb the good order, peace or safety of the State, or shall infringe the laws of morality, or injure others in their natural, civil or religious rights; nor ought any person to be compelled to frequent, or maintain, or contribute, unless on contract, to maintain, any place of worship, or any ministry; nor shall any person, otherwise competent, be deemed incompetent as a witness, or juror, on account of his religious belief; provided, he believes in the existence of God, and that under His dispensation such person will be held morally accountable for his acts, and be rewarded or punished therefor either in this world or in the world to come."
Update:
If you look below Article 36 you will find the following statement:"Nothing in this article shall constitute an establishment of religion (amended by Chapter 558, Acts of 1970, ratified Nov. 3, 1970)."
From Wikipedia:
This apparently was the result of a unanimous 1961 decision by US Supreme court in the case of Torcaso v. Watkins found that an attempt to enforce this provision violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. In 1970, this article was amended to include the sentence "Nothing in this article shall constitute an establishment of religion". However the original wording of the article was also left in place, but presumably is symbolic rather than effective.
So why not just change text of the Article to just remove the language?
Turns out that a unanimous 1961 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Torcaso v. Watkins held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the federal Constitution override these state requirements, so THEY ARE NOT ENFORCED.
Detail on the Torasco v. Watkins case.
Monday, October 10, 2011
Dustin Sanders - Prodigy Piano Studios
Dustin teaches my 11 year old son who has Autism. Although Dustin did not know anything about ASD, he was ready and excited to take on the challenge. He studied up on the topic, asked very appropriate questions and has done a fantastic job adapting to my difficult learner. My son has progressed through 3 books in a little over a year and it would not have been possible without his kind and caring ways. I have played piano semi-professionally for 15 years and I am always learning new approaches and techniques from Dustin. He is a professional in every regard and really cares about his craft.
Again, if you are considering Piano lessons you should consider giving Dustin a call. Please visit his web site and support his business.
You can also read his blog at http://prodigypianostudios.com/eclecticpianoexperience/
Monday, February 14, 2011
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Wednesday, December 08, 2010
I believe that there is no God
I believe that there is no God. I'm beyond atheism. Atheism is not believing in God. Not believing in God is easy — you can't prove a negative, so there's no work to do. You can't prove that there isn't an elephant inside the trunk of my car. You sure? How about now? Maybe he was just hiding before. Check again. Did I mention that my personal heartfelt definition of the word "elephant" includes mystery, order, goodness, love and a spare tire?
So, anyone with a love for truth outside of herself has to start with no belief in God and then look for evidence of God. She needs to search for some objective evidence of a supernatural power. All the people I write e-mails to often are still stuck at this searching stage. The atheism part is easy.
But, this "This I Believe" thing seems to demand something more personal, some leap of faith that helps one see life's big picture, some rules to live by. So, I'm saying, "This I believe: I believe there is no God."
Having taken that step, it informs every moment of my life. I'm not greedy. I have love, blue skies, rainbows and Hallmark cards, and that has to be enough. It has to be enough, but it's everything in the world and everything in the world is plenty for me. It seems just rude to beg the invisible for more. Just the love of my family that raised me and the family I'm raising now is enough that I don't need heaven. I won the huge genetic lottery and I get joy every day.
Believing there's no God means I can't really be forgiven except by kindness and faulty memories. That's good; it makes me want to be more thoughtful. I have to try to treat people right the first time around.
Believing there's no God stops me from being solipsistic. I can read ideas from all different people from all different cultures. Without God, we can agree on reality, and I can keep learning where I'm wrong. We can all keep adjusting, so we can really communicate. I don't travel in circles where people say, "I have faith, I believe this in my heart and nothing you can say or do can shake my faith." That's just a long-winded religious way to say, "shut up," or another two words that the FCC likes less. But all obscenity is less insulting than, "How I was brought up and my imaginary friend means more to me than anything you can ever say or do." So, believing there is no God lets me be proven wrong and that's always fun. It means I'm learning something.
Believing there is no God means the suffering I've seen in my family, and indeed all the suffering in the world, isn't caused by an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent force that isn't bothered to help or is just testing us, but rather something we all may be able to help others with in the future. No God means the possibility of less suffering in the future.
Believing there is no God gives me more room for belief in family, people, love, truth, beauty, sex, Jell-O and all the other things I can prove and that make this life the best life I will ever have.
Monday, November 22, 2010
Cheating at Bejeweled Blitz on Facebook
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Stink BUGS!
Friday, August 06, 2010
Slingbox down?
The SlingBox forums are buzzing with posting the issues they are having. The company has not posted any information for 3 days about what is going on. They are acting like it's some sort of mystical issue that eludes them. COME ON.... a portion of your data center is down!!!!!
Let the public that owns your product know that the problem is? PLEASE!
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
What is autism?
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Learning to feel the music.. can it be done?
His teacher proceeded to play the piece with a style that represented his interpretation of the song. He played the legato parts slightly slower and added more force to the staccato notes. After his teacher finished, Alex criticized his performance (as he has done before) saying that he didn't play it right. At this point his teacher played the piece again but played it like a robot. He played every note exactly as marked. He asked him which way he liked it better. Alex replied, "The second way because it's right"
So he tried another experiment with Alex. He flipped to the back of the book to a piece that Alex has not heard or played and asked him to close his eye. His teacher played the piece as written. Then he said to listen and he was going to play it again. This time he flipped all the legato runs and staccato notes essentially playing it incorrect. Then he asked Alex which he liked better. He said, "I don't know". Why Alex? "Because I don't know which one is right."
The teacher and I agreed that we will continue to let Alex move forward just learning the technical aspects of playing piano as he has not shown any understanding of feel or interpretation of the music.
I was once in a band with a bass player that could not "feel" the music. I was astounded when I found this out. Perhaps he had Autism as well?
I wonder what percentage of people can "feel" or be moved to emotion simply by listening to music?
Saturday, May 01, 2010
Call from 559-272-6487
Someone called me this morning on this number to sell me an extended warranty. They claimed to be a representative of subdivision of BWM. I asked if they were an affiliate or a direct subdivision and he said subdivision. I continued the conversation and it turned out he had the VIN on my car but the model was wrong. When I questioned how they could have the wrong model number, he said some kid must have been messing with the computer. Um, yeah… wrong answer. I started to ask another question and he cut me off with "GO TO HELL" and hung up.
A quick google search shows that this is a telemarketing company and my experience is typical.
I've reported this story to BMW customer service.
Monday, April 05, 2010
Autism Awareness Month
Saturday, May 09, 2009
Playing .MKV files using TVersity on an XBox 360
http://haali.cs.msu.ru/mkv/
Just install and go. Yeah!
Thursday, January 01, 2009
Face it, the $700 billion is gone!
When Paulson and crew make statements like they have "difficulties associated with monitoring the use of specific funds" provided to individual financial institutions, you know it's over!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/31/now-whered-i-put-that-700_n_154550.html